Re: clejuso


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum at Handcuffs.Org ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Klaus on November 27, 2001 at 09:58:27:

In Reply to: Re: clejuso posted by Stan Willis on November 24, 2001 at 18:54:08:

>> I see on this link that there is a problem with the heavy and medium weight cuffs by this mfg.
>> http://www.fortunecity.de/lindenpark/klimt/598/clejuso2.html

> I am a US dealer for Clejuso, and the bad guys have not figured out the problems yet.

Security by obscurity. Deprecated in Computer business. Consider yourself lucky.

> Police should ALWAYS double lock the cuffs, and this eliminates the problems.

Are you serious? Did you really look at these photos?
To exploit this weakness the cuff *has* to be double locked!

Preferably double locked with the bow swinging freely
and then one would try to close the cuff forcibly.

If single locked beyond the first three ratchet positions
and then double locked, the mechanism is less vulnerable
as the torque exerted on this die cast piece is much smaller.

Regards
Klaus

P.S. If #13 or #15 are open, in hammering on the ratchet
one probably could break this die cast piece
regardless of the position of the double lock.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum at Handcuffs.Org ] [ FAQ ]